![]()
|
Separate Search Page Nearly $3 Trillion Dollars in U.S. Health Spending is ProjectedHealthcare spending will top $2.8 trillion in the US by 2011, driving an even larger chunk of the nation's gross domestic product (GDP) than previously forecast, government actuaries reported on March 12, 2002. Spending may reach 17% of GDP by 2011, up from 13.2% in 2000, according to actuaries at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Said another way, annual healthcare spending by 2011 will rise to $9,216 per person in America -- double the amount spent per capita in 2000. CMS said its new outlook for healthcare spending, updated annually, reflects higher projected growth in Medicare and Medicaid expenditures and more sluggish private healthcare spending. While prescription-drug spending will continue to grow at double-digit rates, the rate of spending growth is expected to slow to 10.1% for 2011 from 17.3% for 2000. Actuaries say the slowdown reflects cost-cutting tactics, such as tiered co-payments, and the introduction of fewer blockbuster drugs. "Still, we project that between 2001 - 2011 period, drug spending growth will exceed total health spending growth by almost five percentage points per year on average," according to Stephen Heffler and colleagues from CMS's Office of the Actuary. Drug spending will account for 14.7% of total health expenditures by 2011, compared with 9.4% in 2000, they said. Public-health spending is expected to rise more sharply than previously projected largely due to the effect of higher provider payments and new benefits mandated as part of the 2000 Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act. Medicare spending may rise 9.5% in 2001, outpacing the rate of growth projected last year by 2.5% points. Growth in private-sector spending is expected to be more sluggish than last year's projections because of a weaker-than-anticipated outlook for the nation's economy. Still, actuaries are predicting 8.9% growth for 2001 and 9.4% for 2002, compared with 6.9% for 2000. Health Affairs March/April 2002;21:207-217 DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT: For the first time in almost a decade, according to federal health economists, health expenditures outpaced the growth of the economy. That is one amazing statement. The US currently spends about 1.5 trillion dollars for healthcare, and the projections are that it will double in less than ten years. Like the late Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois was fond of saying when he was referring to the Defense Department budget, a billion dollars here, a billion dollars there and before you know it you are talking real money. Well we are talking a lot more than a few billion dollars. How about something like a nearly 1.5 trillion dollars, an amount that is even beyond Bill Gates level. The sad tragedy is that we are spending all of this money on disease management focused on drugs and surgery and our return on this investment is profoundly poor. Retail pharmacies filled 3 billion prescriptions in 2000. We are not achieving the high levels of health that we could be. More and more people do not have the energy they need to get through the day while millions of others are suffering with painful crippling diseases because they have violated basic health principles. Many of their choices were made out of ignorance and it is my vision and passion to make a dent in this mess. I hope to have many of you help with the process as this web site becomes a major force for good and the alleviation of disease and suffering. |
|
Separate Search Page Health Spending Growing Faster Than U.S. EconomyFor the first time in almost a decade, federal health economists reported January 8, health expenditures outpaced the growth of the economy. Spending rose 6.9% from 1999 to 2000, to $1.3 trillion, while the nation's gross domestic product (GDP) grew 6.5%. This was the third year of accelerating growth in health spending. With the economy in a downturn, health costs are likely to continue to grow faster than the GDP at least for the next few years. The shift may herald the end of several years of relatively free-wheeling spending, when employers offered less restrictive, more costly insurance plans, and hospitals and physicians refused to accept onerous managed care discounts, said the economists. Instead, in 2001, insurers will likely charge higher premiums and employers will ask consumers to pay a higher share of their health costs. From 1999 to 2000, there was a 1.2% increase in the rise in health care spending. Spending grew 5.7% in 1999, but by 6.9% in 2000. While this may sound paltry, this is the largest positive change in the growth rate since 1993. Most of the increase in private and public spending for 2000 -- 24% of the dollar share -- was for hospitals. Hospital costs grew 5.1% in 2000 to $412 billion. The economists said that spending has grown partly because facilities, merged together into ever-larger bargaining units, are extracting higher payments from insurers, particularly from managed care. Hospital labor costs have also increased. Prescription drug spending accounted for 9.4% of the increase. But the cost of drugs rose by 17.3% in 2000, the sixth consecutive year of double-digit growth, according to the authors. Consumers are being hit especially hard, paying more out-of-pocket with each passing year. The economists said that higher spending on outpatient drugs is being fueled by direct-to-consumer advertising, more new drugs on the market and increased coverage of pharmaceuticals by insurers. Health Affairs January/February 2002
DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT: Like the late Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois was fond of saying when he was referring to the Defense Department budget, a billion dollars here, a billion dollars there and before you know it you are talking real money. Well we are talking a lot more than a few billion dollars. How about something like a nearly 1.5 trillion dollars, an amount that is even beyond Bill Gates level. Amazingly 25% of this went to pay for hospital care. The sad tragedy is that we are spending all of this money on disease management focused on drugs and surgery and our return on this investment is profoundly poor. We are not achieving high levels of health that we could be. More and more people do not have the energy they need to get through the day while millions of others are suffering with painful crippling diseases because they have violated basic health principles. Many of their choices were made out of ignorance and it is my vision and passion to make a dent in this mess and I hope to have many of you help with the process as this web site becomes a major force for good and the alleviation of disease and suffering.
|
|
Separate Search Page Prescription Drug Sales Increased By Nearly 20% Last Year in US
Retail prescription
drug spending in the US increased for
the fifth straight year in 2000,
primarily reflecting higher sales of a
relatively small number of drugs.
As an aging population
coped with arthritis, diabetes and high
cholesterol,
spending
on prescription drugs shot up
nearly 20 percent last year,
to $132 billion. Two dozen products accounted for half the increase, which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but because doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs, the study said. The study was
issued today by the National Institute
for Health Care Management Foundation,
a nonprofit, nonpartisan group that
conducts research on health care
issues. The trend will
probably increase political pressure
for new government benefits to help
elderly people buy prescription drugs,
but it also makes clear how costly such
benefits could be. President Bush has
proposed spending $153 billion on drug
benefits and unspecified "Medicare
reforms" over the next 10 years, but
Democrats say that sum is grossly
inadequate, and the foundation's study
may provide new ammunition to both
sides. The $21 billion
increase in spending "was attributable,
in large measure, to the rising volume
of prescriptions for the top-selling
drugs," the study said. Researchers
said
more aggressive marketing by drug
companies contributed to the growth. The top sellers include Vioxx, an arthritis drug made by Merck & Company; Lipitor, a cholesterol reducer sold by Pfizer; Prevacid, an ulcer drug sold by Tap Pharmaceuticals; Celebrex, an arthritis medicine marketed by Pharmacia and Pfizer, and Glucophage, a diabetes drug made by Bristol-Myers Squibb. The increase in
sales of these five drugs alone
accounted for one-fifth of the entire
increase in sales of prescription drugs
last year, the study said. The rate of
increase in drug spending was about the
same last year as in 1999, so the
foundation estimates that
drug
spending rose 40
percent from 1998 to 2000. That growth has
pushed up health insurance premiums for
individuals and families. It has
contributed to increases in the cost of
health benefits provided by employers.
And it has driven up the cost of
Medicaid, the federal-state program for
the poor. The report
identified three factors contributing
to the increase in retail spending on
prescription drugs last year. It said
that 42 percent was attributable to an
increase in the number of prescriptions
written by doctors and filled by
pharmacies. At the same time,
it said, a
shift
toward the use of more expensive drugs
accounted for 36 percent of the overall
increase in spending, while
price
increases accounted for the
remaining 22 percent. The 50
top-selling medicines accounted for 30
percent of all prescriptions last year,
and these medications cost almost twice
as much as other drugs, the report
said. The average price for a
prescription for one of the top 50
drugs was $67, while the average for
other drugs was $36, it said. Retail pharmacies
filled 3 billion prescriptions last
year, an increase of over 7 percent
over the 2.7 billion filled in 1999,
the study said. But the 50 best-selling
drugs posted a much sharper increase,
as the number of prescriptions rose
over 18 percent, to 867 million, from
731 million. The government
recently predicted that drug spending
would rise an average of 12 percent a
year in the coming decade, as
scientists unlock secrets of the human
genome, the baby boom generation ages
and the nation pours huge sums into
biomedical research, filling the
pipeline with potentially useful new
drugs. Drug companies
say they are developing more than 350
medicines to fight cancer and more than
120 to treat or prevent heart disease
and stroke.
Antidepressants were the best-
selling category of prescription
medicines last year,
as they were in
1999. Retail sales of antidepressants
totaled over $10 billion in 2000, up 21
percent from the previous year. The average price
for a prescription of antidepressants
was $68 last year, up from $63 in 1999.
The report said
this change "reflects a rise in the
price of individual drugs, but also the
fact that pharmacies are dispensing
more of the more expensive
antidepressants such as Paxil, Celexa
and Wellbutrin." These drugs, it said,
are 50 percent to 75 percent more
expensive than other antidepressants. Comparing the
number of prescriptions filled in each
of the last two years, the study found
that retail pharmacies dispensed 42
percent more Celebrex, 32 percent more
Lipitor, 31 percent more Prevacid, 30
percent more Viagra (for impotence), 71
percent more Enbrel (for rheumatoid
arthritis) and 74 percent more
Singulair (for asthma). Nancy Chockley,
president of the National Institute for
Health Care Management Foundation,
said: "The recent rise in
pharmaceutical spending is due, in
large measure, to the growth in sales
of a relatively small number of
medicines. Most of these drugs are the
blockbusters many Americans have come
to know by name and see advertised more
and more." More
aggressive marketing of
prescription drugs to consumers and
doctors has stimulated a major increase
in sales, in part because consumers
learn of new remedies and ask their
doctors for prescriptions, researchers
said. Better insurance coverage for
drugs has also contributed to the
trend, by making consumers somewhat
less sensitive to drug prices. Nineteen drugs
had retail sales exceeding $1 billion
last year, up from 15 such drugs in
1999.
Leading
the list of top sellers was
Prilosec,
the antiulcer drug sold by AstraZeneca,
with sales of $4 billion last year, up
from $3.6 billion in 1999. While total sales
of prescription drugs rose 19 percent
last year, sales of the 50 best-selling
drugs rose 30 percent, to $58 billion,
from $45 billion in 1999. Drugs to treat
ulcers, heartburn and other
gastrointestinal problems were second
to antidepressants in overall sales.
Retail sales of these medicines totaled
$9.5 billion last year, up 20 percent
from 1999. Sales of Prilosec rose 12.4
percent, to $4 billion last year, while
sales of its main competitor, Prevacid,
increased 37 percent, to $3 billion. The study was
based on data from Scott-Levin Inc., a
health care market research company in
Newtown, Pa. The figures do not include
mail- order sales. But the report said
mail- order sales of prescription drugs
totaled $16 billion last year, up 26
percent from $12.7 billion in 1999.
National Institute for Health Care
Management Research and Educational
Foundation May 11, 2001 DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT: Isn't this
just a prescription for disaster? The
drug companies are having their heyday
now. They are not stupid by any stretch
of the imagination. They have hired
some of the most effective marketing
people in the country to promote their
products. Additionally,
the increased media exposure through
direct advertisments on television to
consumers is making a huge impact. However, folks
the emperor has no clothes, and the
emperor knows it. The traditional
paradigm is fatally flawed. It does NOT
work for any chronic illness. The
drug/surgery model is an unmitigated
disaster that has greatly contributed
to pharmaceutical profits at the
expense of the health of our country. The truth will
come out. I hope to facilitate that
with this site. You can help by passing
this newsletter to as many people as
you know, so they will have PRACTICAL
alternatives to this drug based model
that work and will not accelerate the
death rate. Believe me folks, the drug companies are NOT your friends. They could care less about your health. Their main concern is corporate profits. If you don't believe me carefully review the links below.
|
|
I promise to answer your message -- click here to send me a personal message
|
SUBSCRIBE: The Wednesday Letter is a free electronic monthly newsletter written and published by Karl Loren. You can view more than 50 back issues of this publication by clicking here. The Wednesday Letter subscription list is maintained on a secure server, no name is ever given or sold to anyone, and it is never used except for this Newsletter. It is automatically published on the Tuesday night just before the first Wednesday of every month. You can subscribe to this free monthly electronic letter by entering your eMail address and name below. You will then automatically receive a request for confirmation, sent to whatever address you have entered. If you do NOT receive this confirmation request, then you will not be subscribed. There may have been an error with your address and you should resubmit. The letter is never sent twice to the same address -- so you do not have to worry about a duplicate subscription. When you receive this confirmation request you must reply to it, or your subscription will not become active. No one can subscribe your name, and address, without you being notified, and if you get an unwanted notice of subscription you only need to DO NOTHING and the subscription will NOT be active.
REMOVAL: You can remove yourself from the subscription list in several different ways. Click here to read about this entire newsletter system. Every edition of The Wednesday Letter is delivered to your address with YOUR name and address in view on the letter, with a link that allows you to remove THAT name from the subscription list. If you try to send this removal message from an address different from the one you used to send in your original confirmation, then you will get a warning notice first, sent to the subscription address, asking you to confirm that you want to be removed from the list -- by replying to THAT request for confirmation, you will then be automatically removed. Thus, no one else can unsubscribe you, from some other computer, without your knowledge. But, if you send in the unsubscribe notice from the same machine used to receive the Letter, then the removal from the subscription list is automatic.
Personal Message: When you send a personal message to Karl Loren, you will receive a personal reply as per his instructions. Karl pledges that every personal message will get a personal answer. When you provide your mail address, we will send you free information including our free catalog and a cassette tape lecture by Karl Loren about heart disease, no charge, by mail, even if outside the US. You can select particular information you would like to receive, along with the free cassette tape and catalog.
You can reach Vibrant Life in many ways, including by mail to Vibrant Life, 2808 N. Naomi St., Burbank, CA 91504. Within the US and Canada, use the toll free number: (800) 523-4521, the local number: (818) 558-1799, the FAX: (818) 558-7299, eMail to kimberly@oralchelation.com or any one of the hundreds of message forms throughout the 50 web sites. Vibrant Life normally ships the same day we get an order. There are message forms on each of the 100,000+ pages on this and other sites where you can communicate with Vibrant Life. Check out our companion site, at: http://www.oralchelation.net where Karl's 2000 page book is published. Karl Loren is the author and webmaster for this BOOK, as well as for another web site about ORAL CHELATION. His personal philosophical articles are at PHILOSOPHY.
Copyright © April 25, 2008 2:38 AM by Karl Loren on behalf of Vibrant Life, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Permission is granted for non-commercial downloading, copying, distribution or redistribution on two conditions: One, that some form of copyright notice is included in every copy distributed or copied, showing the copyright belonging to Vibrant Life, Burbank, CA, at www.oralchelation.com . The second condition is that the material is not to be used for any purpose contrary to the purposes and objectives of this site. This permission does not extend to materials on this site which are copyrighted by others.