Definitions Of Words Related To Chelation
![]()
chelate (noun)
A stable complex of a metal with one or more
polydentate ligands. For example, calcium complexes with EDTA
to form a chelate.
chelating agent -- chelator
A ligand
that binds to a metal using more than one atom; a polydentate
ligand.
A ligand
that has more than one atom that coordinates directly to the
central atom in a complex. Polydentate ligands are called
chelating agents when two or more coordinating atoms are attached
to the same metal ion in a complex. For example, EDTA
or ethylenediaminotetracetic acid is a hexadentate ligand of
calcium ion.
Ligand
1. In inorganic chemistry, a molecule or ion that binds to a metal cation to form a complex.
2. In biochemistry, a molecule that binds to a receptor, having a biological effect.
Polydentate -- Polydentate ligand
A ligand
that has more than one atom that coordinates directly to the
central atom in a complex. Polydentate ligands are called
chelating agents when two or more coordinating atoms are
attached to the same metal ion in a complex. For example, EDTA
or ethylenediaminotetracetic acid is a hexadentate ligand of
calcium ion.
Strong Ligand -- Strong Field Ligand
Compare
with weak ligand
.
A ligand that causes a large crystal field splitting which results in a low-spin complex.
Weak Ligand -- weak field ligand
Compare
with strong field ligand
.
A ligand that causes a small crystal field splitting which results in a high-spin complex.
The cellular targets (or receptors) of many drugs used for medical treatment are proteins. By binding to the receptor, drugs either enhance or inhibit its activity. Basically there are two major groups of receptor proteins: proteins that "float" around in the cytoplasm of the cell, and proteins that are incorporated into the cell membrane. In the latter case, a drug does not even need to enter the cell, it can bind simply to an extracellular binding site of the protein and control intracellular reactions from the outside.


Two representations of a drug or
"ligand" which is bound to a specific region ("domain") of a
"receptor" protein. The first image shows caves and cavities
of the binding domain (visualised by the yellow grid). The
ligand is shown in purple. It is buried in an internal cave
of the protein. The second image displays the folding
pattern of the protein and shows the structural organisation
of the binding site. The protein backbone is drawn in blue,
the ligand in purple.
An important criterion to determine the medical value of a drug is specificity: the physiological effect of the drug should be as clearly defined as possible. It has to specifically bind to the target protein in order to minimise undesired side-effects. The idea that molecules can interact in a highly specific manner has a long history in medical chemistry. A century ago, Fischer and Ehrlich already used a "lock-and-key" analogy. Undesired side-effects, however, are not always an indication for insufficient specificity of drugs as these effects might also result from a reaction of our body to the desired and therefore successful regulation of the malfunctioning biochemical process.
On the molecular level specificity includes two more or less independent mechanisms: first the drug has to bind to its receptor site with a suitable affinity (better binding means lower doses) and second it has to either stimulate or inhibit certain movements of the receptor protein in order to regulate its activity. Both mechanisms are mediated by a variety of interactions between the drug and its receptor site. Usually tens of thousands of compounds have to be screened to find a promising new drug and only very few of these candidates will make their way through the final clinical tests. Looking for help from powerful computers seems straightforward. So how can they help?

A more detailed image of the ligand
binding cavity shown in the beginning.
Again, the ligand is displayed in purple, and the yellow
grid shows the contour of the protein at the binding site.
The input of biocomputing in drug discovery is twofold: firstly the computer may help to optimise the pharmacological profile of existing drugs by guiding the synthesis of new and "better" compounds. Secondly, as more and more structural information on possible protein targets and their biochemical role in the cell becomes available, completely new therapeutic concepts can be developed. The computer helps in both steps: to find out about possible biological functions of a protein by comparing its amino acid sequence to databases of proteins with known function, and to understand the molecular workings of a given protein structure. Understanding the biological or biochemical mechanism of a disease then often suggests the types of molecules needed for new drugs.
In all cases, the aim of using the computer for drug design is to analyse the interactions between the drug and its receptor site and to "design" molecules that give an optimal fit. The central assumption is that a good fit results from structural and chemical complementarity to the target receptor. The techniques provided by computational methods include computer graphics for visualisation and the methodology of theoretical chemistry. By means of quantum mechanics the structure of small molecules can be predicted to experimental accuracy. Statistical mechanics permits molecular motion and solvent effects to be incorporated. Basically statistical mechanics is a three-dimensional equivalent of describing the position of billiard balls using Newton's law of motion.

The ligand (purple) is shown
together with possible interaction partners of the binding
site (blue). Residues within 10 Angstrom (10-10
meters) of the ligand are considered as putative interaction
partners.
The best possible starting point is an X-ray crystal structure of the target site. If the molecular model of the binding site is precise enough, one can apply docking algorithms that simulate the binding of drugs to the respective receptor site. In a first step these programs create a negative image of the target site, as shown above, place the putative ligands into the site, as shown down below , and finally they evaluate the quality of the fit.
Even if the structure of the receptor site is unknown the computer may help to figure out how it might look by comparing the chemical and physical properties of drugs that are known to act at a specific site. Moreover, if the amino acid sequence of the receptor site is known, one can try to predict the structure of the unknown site. This can either be done "from scratch" (which still is rather an adventure...) or by using a known structure of a related protein as template. If about 25 to 30 % of the amino acid residues are identical in two proteins, one may assume, that the three-dimensional structure of these two proteins is very similar, see also Joelle Thonnard's contribution. The technique used for this approach is called "homology modelling": the folding pattern of the template protein is maintained and the side chain atoms of the template protein are replaced by the side chain atoms of the unknown protein. Basically, the three-dimensional structure of a protein is represented by the three-dimensional organisation of the backbone atoms. The side chain atoms, which are different for all 20 amino acids, define the specific interactions with ligands or other protein domains. Replacing the side chains while maintaining the backbone therefore allows to keep the general structure of the protein and to evaluate the specific properties of the unknown protein with respect to ligand interactions.


These two images show possible
orientations and conformations of the ligand in the binding
pocket (same as above) in side view (first image) and top
view (second image). The different conformations are
generated and evaluated using computer programs. Similar
calculations are performed for a set of different molecules.
Those molecules giving the highest interaction energies are
considered for further experimental tests. The calculations
were done using
During the last years, we have witnessed a huge progress
in the development of new methods in the field of molecular
biology and computer science. This has improved the tools
for rational drug design significantly. More and more new
drugs are developed with the help of computer techniques. A
prominent example is the design of potent HIV protease
inhibitors (Science, 263, 1994, 380). The design was based
on knowledge of the target structure.
The computational power is yet insufficient to simulate
complex biochemical reactions or even to monitor
conformational changes of proteins caused by the binding of
ligands. There are, however, examples where the opposite
process, the unbinding of a ligand, was monitored (Science,
271, 1996, 997). These results confirm that we are able to
successfully simulate and predict the basic principles of
ligand-receptor interactions.
All figures were prepared using the WHATIF software package.
|
I promise to answer your message -- click here to send me a personal message
|
SUBSCRIBE: The Wednesday Letter is a free electronic monthly newsletter written and published by Karl Loren. You can view more than 50 back issues of this publication by clicking here. The Wednesday Letter subscription list is maintained on a secure server, no name is ever given or sold to anyone, and it is never used except for this Newsletter. It is automatically published on the Tuesday night just before the first Wednesday of every month. You can subscribe to this free monthly electronic letter by entering your eMail address and name below. You will then automatically receive a request for confirmation, sent to whatever address you have entered. If you do NOT receive this confirmation request, then you will not be subscribed. There may have been an error with your address and you should resubmit. The letter is never sent twice to the same address -- so you do not have to worry about a duplicate subscription. When you receive this confirmation request you must reply to it, or your subscription will not become active. No one can subscribe your name, and address, without you being notified, and if you get an unwanted notice of subscription you only need to DO NOTHING and the subscription will NOT be active.
REMOVAL: You can remove yourself from the subscription list in several different ways. Click here to read about this entire newsletter system. Every edition of The Wednesday Letter is delivered to your address with YOUR name and address in view on the letter, with a link that allows you to remove THAT name from the subscription list. If you try to send this removal message from an address different from the one you used to send in your original confirmation, then you will get a warning notice first, sent to the subscription address, asking you to confirm that you want to be removed from the list -- by replying to THAT request for confirmation, you will then be automatically removed. Thus, no one else can unsubscribe you, from some other computer, without your knowledge. But, if you send in the unsubscribe notice from the same machine used to receive the Letter, then the removal from the subscription list is automatic.
Personal Message: When you send a personal message to Karl Loren, you will receive a personal reply as per his instructions. Karl pledges that every personal message will get a personal answer. When you provide your mail address, we will send you free information including our free catalog and a cassette tape lecture by Karl Loren about heart disease, no charge, by mail, even if outside the US. You can select particular information you would like to receive, along with the free cassette tape and catalog.
You can reach Vibrant Life in many ways, including by mail to Vibrant Life, 2808 N. Naomi St., Burbank, CA 91504. Within the US and Canada, use the toll free number: (800) 523-4521, the local number: (818) 558-1799, the FAX: (818) 558-7299, eMail to kimberly@oralchelation.com or any one of the hundreds of message forms throughout the 50 web sites. Vibrant Life normally ships the same day we get an order. There are message forms on each of the 100,000+ pages on this and other sites where you can communicate with Vibrant Life. Check out our companion site, at: http://www.oralchelation.net where Karl's 2000 page book is published. Karl Loren is the author and webmaster for this BOOK, as well as for another web site about ORAL CHELATION. His personal philosophical articles are at PHILOSOPHY.
Copyright © May 20, 2008 6:24 AM by Karl Loren on behalf of Vibrant Life, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Permission is granted for non-commercial downloading, copying, distribution or redistribution on two conditions: One, that some form of copyright notice is included in every copy distributed or copied, showing the copyright belonging to Vibrant Life, Burbank, CA, at www.oralchelation.com . The second condition is that the material is not to be used for any purpose contrary to the purposes and objectives of this site. This permission does not extend to materials on this site which are copyrighted by others.