![]()
[Karl Note: Here is a great example of the perfidy of the drug industry. It is well accepted in many places that "Taheebo Tea" will eliminate cancer. So, if that seems to be true, what would be the usual drug company action?
Taheebo, itself, of course, cannot patented. It is the bark of a tree -- God did it! Eli Lilly can't patent it!
So, the drug companies do this all the time.
They take the natural substance, some herb, or bark, or whatever, and try to find out what is the "active ingredient" in that material -- they then try to figure out how they can manufacture, artificially, that active ingredient. If they can do THAT, they can usually get a patent on this synthesized substance -- because, of course, it was made "unnaturally," or artificially.
The FDA will approve a new drug if, first, it is SAFE, then it must be EFFECTIVE.
Taheebo Tea is both safe and effective -- but it is a natural substance.
Here is my web page where I present many scientific studies on the active ingredient thought to be in Taheebo:
http://www.oralchelation.com/technical/taheebo1.htm
There are twenty different scientific studies on that link.
Many of these studies do not mention "taheebo" but they do mention "lapachal" which is generally considered the "active ingredient" in Taheebo Bark.
Click here for an excellent history of the medical studies of Taheebo.
There are "many" forms of "lapachal" so that term, too, needs further study.
The scientific studies that delved into the usefulness of Taheebo would NEVER be made public, so don't even try to find them. But, the drug company did the work. They found a way to EXTRACT the active ingredients out of the bark -- only then could they get a patent.
Then tested that active ingredient in the standard way -- with mice that had been deliberately given cancer. The found that this active ingredient was "effective in reducing tumors in mice." That is a fantastic discovery -- there are very few substances that show promise so easily.
Now, keep in mind that they were NOT testing "taheebo bark" or any natural form of that bark -- they had taken a small component from the bark -- called a "lapachal" and tested that. THIS was the stuff that was effective in reducing tumors.
So, finding that some component of Taheebo would "reduce tumors in mice" was the EFFECTIVE part of the requirement for FDA approval, but not the SAFE part.
This effective substance was found, unfortunately, to have some adverse side effects.
Here is one reference to toxicity:
Perhaps the most significant study on toxicity was published in 1970 by researchers from the Chase Pfizer & Co., Inc. Looking specifically at lapachol, these investigators found that all signs of lapachol toxicity in animals were completely reversible and even self limiting, i.e., over time the signs of toxicity decreased and even disappeared within the time constraints of the study. The most severe kinds of self-limiting side-effects they observed were an anti-vitamin K effect, anemia, and significant rises of metabolic and protein toxins in the blood stream. The diminution of these signs indicates that lapacho initiates an immediate "alterative" or "detoxification" effect on the body's cells. Once the cells are "cleaned up," the signs of toxicity disappear. This effect is quite common among herbal tonics. (source)
So, per FDA guidelines, there was no reason to pursue the studies. If it shows to be toxic, in any form, the research is not continued.
Keep in mind that this research was NOT with Taheebo bark, or any simple extract of that bark -- but rather a chemically synthesized material that could be patented. The drug company has ZERO reason to prove that some natural substance can be effective in treating cancer, etc.
The drug company did NOT test, or certainly did not ever release, any findings that the taheebo bark, or any simple extract, was toxic in any way.
It is not.
Here is another study result:
The main active ingredient is a substance called lapachol, a substance whose molecular composition makes it uniquely suited to induce strong biological activity against cancer. Nine patients with various cancers (liver, kidney, breast and prostate adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell carcinoma of the palate and uterine cervix) were given pure lapachol in 250-mg [milligrams] capsules with meals. All 9 patients showed a shrinkage of tumors and reductions in tumor-related pain; 3 patients experienced complete remissions, and there were no adverse side effects. (Santana) (source)
Here is a link to my Google Search Example, entering the word "taheebo" on just one of my web sites-- and finding about 30 different pages where that word is used.
The FDA gave Taheebo bark, itself, a clean bill of health in 1981.
The FDA would love nothing better than to shut down the sale of herbal medicines in the U.S. since it represents a serious threat to the economic health of the American pharmaceutical industry. However, by law, they are limited to removing substances which are unsafe. Therefore herbal medicines will survive, at least until the law is changed. However, all this could come to a swift reorganization if Codex Alimentarius is approved. (Source)
There has NEVER been any test that shows that Taheebo Bark, or any simple extraction from it, is dangerous or toxic.
Despite the deceptive claims made below, the truth is here and above.
Those who find references like the below, are looking for bad news, and generally never will accept the truth even if it is obvious to a sane person.
|
I promise to answer your message -- click here to send me a personal message
|
SUBSCRIBE: The Wednesday Letter is a free electronic monthly newsletter written and published by Karl Loren. You can view more than 50 back issues of this publication by clicking here. The Wednesday Letter subscription list is maintained on a secure server, no name is ever given or sold to anyone, and it is never used except for this Newsletter. It is automatically published on the Tuesday night just before the first Wednesday of every month. You can subscribe to this free monthly electronic letter by entering your eMail address and name below. You will then automatically receive a request for confirmation, sent to whatever address you have entered. If you do NOT receive this confirmation request, then you will not be subscribed. There may have been an error with your address and you should resubmit. The letter is never sent twice to the same address -- so you do not have to worry about a duplicate subscription. When you receive this confirmation request you must reply to it, or your subscription will not become active. No one can subscribe your name, and address, without you being notified, and if you get an unwanted notice of subscription you only need to DO NOTHING and the subscription will NOT be active.
REMOVAL: You can remove yourself from the subscription list in several different ways. Click here to read about this entire newsletter system. Every edition of The Wednesday Letter is delivered to your address with YOUR name and address in view on the letter, with a link that allows you to remove THAT name from the subscription list. If you try to send this removal message from an address different from the one you used to send in your original confirmation, then you will get a warning notice first, sent to the subscription address, asking you to confirm that you want to be removed from the list -- by replying to THAT request for confirmation, you will then be automatically removed. Thus, no one else can unsubscribe you, from some other computer, without your knowledge. But, if you send in the unsubscribe notice from the same machine used to receive the Letter, then the removal from the subscription list is automatic.
Personal Message: When you send a personal message to Karl Loren, you will receive a personal reply as per his instructions. Karl pledges that every personal message will get a personal answer. When you provide your mail address, we will send you free information including our free catalog and a cassette tape lecture by Karl Loren about heart disease, no charge, by mail, even if outside the US. You can select particular information you would like to receive, along with the free cassette tape and catalog.
You can reach Vibrant Life in many ways, including by mail to Vibrant Life, 2808 N. Naomi St., Burbank, CA 91504. Within the US and Canada, use the toll free number: (800) 523-4521, the local number: (818) 558-1799, the FAX: (818) 558-7299, eMail to kimberly@oralchelation.com or any one of the hundreds of message forms throughout the 50 web sites. Vibrant Life normally ships the same day we get an order. There are message forms on each of the 100,000+ pages on this and other sites where you can communicate with Vibrant Life. Check out our companion site, at: http://www.oralchelation.net where Karl's 2000 page book is published. Karl Loren is the author and webmaster for this BOOK, as well as for another web site about ORAL CHELATION. His personal philosophical articles are at PHILOSOPHY.
Copyright © May 20, 2008 6:24 AM by Karl Loren on behalf of Vibrant Life, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Permission is granted for non-commercial downloading, copying, distribution or redistribution on two conditions: One, that some form of copyright notice is included in every copy distributed or copied, showing the copyright belonging to Vibrant Life, Burbank, CA, at www.oralchelation.com . The second condition is that the material is not to be used for any purpose contrary to the purposes and objectives of this site. This permission does not extend to materials on this site which are copyrighted by others.