Chapter Five -- The Official Lie
Life Flow One
The Solution For Heart Disease
by
Karl Loren
|
|
"I never had sex with that woman!" |
There are all sorts of lies about heart disease. The most nasty, in my mind, are those which are endorsed at the highest levels of force within our society -- the Federal Government. When the President lies, or a figure at a similar level lies, it has tremendous ramifications.
|
|
"There is a vast right wing conspiracy against my husband!" |
When it comes to the Federal Government, the highest position of authority within the Public Health Service has traditionally been the Surgeon General. He is not a person expected to add his own personal research and opinion to the marketplace of ideas, but with all the vast scope of government at his command, he IS the one to sift through all the competing ideas and put his blessing on the BEST ideas in health care. In 1988, Surgeon General Koop said:
|
"Epidemilogic, clinical, and animal studies provide strong and consistent evidence for the relationship between saturated fat intake, high blood cholesterol, and increased risk for coronary heart disease." |
|
The significance of his position here is that
all the various competing ideas, backed by
different amounts of political clout, filter
up to the top. It's the winner in politics
that gets reported by the Surgeon General --
not the truth. By 1988 the forces in favor
of lies had attained sufficient clout within
the government to bend the Office of the
Surgeon General to their cause -- truth has
nothing to do with decisions of this type.
This Surgeon General is a stranger to truth! He is a paid puppet!
He was
small potatoes compared to the very highest
officials in our government who have lied and
gotten away with it. Dr. Koop also has
gotten away with it. He would probably say
that "They lied to ME!" Well, that's what
the President's Press Secretary, Mike McCurry,
said!
|
|
The
President did not have sex with that
woman! |
Click here to review the full scope of lying by the Presidential News Secretary, Mike McCurry.
You are the victim of this stuff! It is NOT just a titillating TV spectacle -- it involves your life and your death!
Not too
long ago the Secretary of State wagged her
fingers at the press corps and told them that
"her" president was not a liar -- that he did
not have sex with that girl!
|
|
Secretary Of State Lying For Her Man! |
In 1988 the Surgeon General was Dr. C. Everett Koop. Click here to read the history of the Surgeon General's Reports. Dr. Koop's official position on cholesterol:
Epidemilogic, clinical, and animal studies provide strong and consistent evidence for the relationship between saturated fat [butter] intake, high blood cholesterol, and increased risk for coronary heart disease. Conversely, reducing blood cholesterol levels reduces the risk for death from coronary heart disease. Excessive saturated fat consumption is the major dietary contributor to total blood cholesterol levels. Dietary cholesterol raises blood cholesterol levels, but the effect is less pronounced than that of saturated fat. While polyunsaturated fatty acid consumption, and probably monosaturated fatty acid consumption, lowers total blood cholesterol, the precise effects of specific fatty acids are not well defined.
. . .
Dietary cholesterol is found only in foods of animal origin, such as eggs, meat, poultry, fish and dairy products. (click here for this exact spot in the Surgeon General's Report)
This report is not significant because there are a large number of people who read and believe it. No, that is not the reason it is important. Very few members of the public ever read the Annual Surgeon General's Report. As the report itself (click here to read the entire report, on this web site) states:
This report was prepared primarily for nutritional policy makers, although the eventual beneficiaries of better nutritional policy will be the American people. I am convinced that with a concerted effort on the part of policy makers throughout the Nation, and eventually by the public, our daily diets can bring a substantial measure of better health to all Americans. I commend to them the recommendations of this Report.
|
|
Some
whores make millions of dollars out of
their affairs! They write a book! |
Dr. Koop's lies are now exposed as a deceit -- but you didn't even know that he lied! You probably never read the Surgeon General's Report, or you've forgotten it. You should not forget it because those lies continue even today. While Monica will probably reap millions of dollars from her books and appearances . . . . . .
|
|
Dr. Koop has also been rewarded with fame and prestige at Dartmouth University. |
I have documented many "doctors" who contributed to the lies about cholesterol -- and I've followed them up now. They did their lying in 1980s and here in 1999 they have all been rewarded for being so nicely controlled puppets. I've followed up them individually, as you'll see below.
When I say that people die of ignorance, I'm really indicting the Federal Government, and the Surgeon General, for spreading lies which lead to stupidity and death. In a land where liars prosper and their victims don't even know why they are victims, an expose of these lies should be an important part of your reference material. This Chapter and the last one, explain why millions of Americans have died -- because of the official lies on the subject of cholesterol by the Government of the United States. You know, from our recent experience, that lies of this magnitude are possible.
The lies by the government were intended to influence doctors into repeating the lies. The doctors did just that -- they still spread this false story.
|
Millions of people, listening to thousands of doctors, have been given false information about the dangers of eating butter and eggs. When those liars are reborn I hope they come back as cockroaches, about a million times -- getting sprayed with bug killer every time! |
|
Now, with the stage set -- the Surgeon General himself ready to endorse the lie which started back in some smoke-filled master planner's room, in 1946, we finally move back to 1987 when the final attack by the master planners was launched. (If you have not read Chapter Four, you should. That is where the history up to this date, 1987, is explained in detail.)
Remember, I jumped ahead to 1988, and the Surgeon General's official position, not because his endorsement of this lie was needed for the 1987 attack, but simply to show that the lie had captured all the powerful people within the government by 1987. The 1988 Report of the Surgeon General represented his official opinion in 1987 also.
What happened in 1987?
|
|
The War On America |
There are all sorts of wars. The most insidious are those where the enemy is completely hidden and the victim thinks he is receiving help from that enemy. In fact, this war was to be the final chapter in the intended betrayal of America into the hands of the legalized drug cartels.
|
|
The most infamous research in heart disease centers around Framingham, Massachusetts. You'll find Framingham to be west of Boston, where the red star is on the map. The planning for this final attack started in 1971, immediately after the first reports from Framingham Study were released. Remember that the Framingham Study, itself, made no finding that dietary cholesterol caused heart disease -- in fact it found exactly the opposite.
|
But, the master planners simply took the color "white" and called it "black!"
In 1971 these master planners formed the Task Force on Arteriosclerosis. The terrible story behind this corrupt group is very well told by Thomas Moore in his Book, Heart Failure.
Over many pages, in great detail, Mr. Moore reports on individual master planners. There was a peak in their activities, in December, 1984, when they formed the Consensus Development Conference. The previous link is for a description of the process, itself -- a "consensus development conference." Click Here to see the actual document from the 1984 Conference.
|
One of these master planners was Dr. Daniel Steinberg. Dr. Steinberg could be called the father of death by cholesterol lies. But, he has now been whitewashed -- made to look respectable. Click here to read an interview in which he, now, endorses vitamins as a preventive for heart disease. The whitewasher should have known better. But, for a more candid view of Dr. Steinberg's real position, click here. |
|
Dr. Steinberg was a physician who worked on cholesterol drug research at the University of California at San Diego. He was the Chairman of the Conference and cut off any speaker who criticized the lie that was being launched. He may wish to forget this, or hide it, but those who were there will remember. This "conference" was NOT administered in the way prescribed by the current rules!
Another master planner was Dr. Robert I. Levy of Columbia University.
Another master planner was Dr. Richard Peto, an Oxford University epidemiologist. Review of dozens of scientific studies for which he gets credit do not include this infamous period when he contributed to the lies about cholesterol. He is another who hides his past -- as those guards at Nuremberg who, found after 50 years, claim that it was just too long ago for them to be brought to justice.
|
|
Technically, the head master planner was Dr. Basil M. Rifkind. He presented false data to the Conference and Dr. Steinberg cut off any debate on it. Dr. Rifkind had taken over from Dr. Steinberg, in some flawed research referred to as the Coronary Primary Prevention Trial, CPPT, of which more later. (Dr. Rifkind has been active spreading lies and preventing truth even a few years ago. He has not disappeared!) |
Here is a quote from another researcher on this subject. Click here to read the entire report:
LRC [Lipid Research Clinics] researchers claimed that the group taking the cholesterol-lowering drug had a 17 per cent reduction in the rate of CHD [coronary heart disease], with an average cholesterol reduction of 8.5 per cent. This allowed LRC trials Director Basil Rifkind to claim that "for each 1% reduction in cholesterol, we can expect a 2% reduction in CHD events".
The statement was widely circulated, even though it represented a completely invalid representation of the data - especially in light of the fact that when the University of Maryland lipid group analyzed the LRC data, they found no difference in CHD events between the group taking the drug and those on the placebo.
In the picture to the right -- find the honest one(s)!
A number of clinicians and statisticians, including Michael Oliver and Richard Krommel, who participated in a 1984 Lipid Research Clinics conference workshop, were highly critical of the manner in which the LRC results had been tabulated and manipulated. In fact, the conference went very badly for the NHLBI, with critics of the lipid hypothesis almost outnumbering supporters. One participant, Dr. Beverly Teter of the University of Maryland's lipid group, was delighted with the state of affairs. "It's wonderful," she remarked to Basil Rifkind, "to finally hear both sides of the debate. We need more meetings like this." His reply was terse and sour: "No we don't."
Dissenters were again invited to speak briefly at the NHLBI-sponsored National Cholesterol Consensus Conference held later that year, but their views were not included in the panel's report for the simple reason that the report was generated by NHLBI staff before the conference convened. Dr Bev Teter discovered this when she picked up some papers by mistake just before the conference began, and found they contained the consensus report, already written, with just a few numbers left blank. Kritchevsky represented the lipid hypothesis camp with a humorous five-minute presentation full of ditties. Edward Ahrens, a respected researcher, raised strenuous objections about the "consensus", only to be told that he had misinterpreted his own data, and that if he wanted a conference to come up with different conclusions he should pay for it himself.
The 1984 Cholesterol Consensus Conference final report was a whitewash, containing no mention of the large body of evidence that conflicted with the lipid hypothesis. One of the blanks was filled in with the number '200'. The document defined all those with cholesterol levels above 200 mg/dL as "at risk" and called for mass cholesterol screening, even though the most ardent supporters of the lipid hypothesis had surmised in print that 240 should be the magic cut-off point. Such screening would in fact need to be carried out on a massive scale, as the federal medical bureaucracy, by picking the number 200, had defined the vast majority of the American adult population as "at risk".
The report resurrected the ghost of Norman Jolliffe and his Prudent Diet by suggesting the avoidance of saturated fat and cholesterol for all Americans now defined as "at risk," and specifically advised the replacement of butter with margarine.
The Consensus Conference also provided a launching pad for the nationwide National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) which had the stated goal of "changing physicians' attitudes". NHLBI-funded studies had determined that while the general population had bought into the lipid hypothesis and was dutifully using margarine and buying low-cholesterol foods, the medical profession remained skeptical. A large "Physicians Kit" was sent to all doctors in America, compiled in part by the American Pharmaceutical Association whose representatives served on the NCEP coordinating committee. Doctors were taught the importance of cholesterol screening, the advantages of cholesterol-lowering drugs and the unique benefits of the Prudent Diet. NCEP materials told every doctor in America to recommend the use of margarine rather than butter.
In November of 1986, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a series on the Lipid Research Clinics trials, including "Cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease: A New Era" by long-time American Heart Association member Scott Grundy, MD, PhD.35 The article is a disturbing combination of euphoria and agony - euphoria at the forward movement of the lipid hypothesis juggernaut, and agony over the elusive nature of real proof. [Click here to review 56 different studies on cholesterol and heart disease during the period 1985 to 1987.]
"The recent Consensus Conference on Cholesterol...implied that levels between 200 and 240...carry at least a mild increase in risk, which they obviously do...," said Grundy, directly contradicting an earlier statement: "Evidence relating plasma cholesterol levels to atherosclerosis and CHD has become so strong as to leave little doubt of the etiologic connection." Grundy called for "the simple step of measuring the plasma cholesterol level in all adults" and said, "...those found to have elevated cholesterol levels can be designated as at high risk and thereby can enter the medical care system ... an enormous number of patients will be included." Who benefits from "the simple step of measuring the plasma cholesterol level in all adults"? Why, hospitals, laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, the vegetable oil industry, margarine manufacturers, food processors and, of course, medical doctors.
"Many physicians will see the advantages of using drugs for cholesterol lowering...," said Grundy, even though "a positive benefit/risk ratio for cholesterol-lowering drugs will be difficult to prove". In the US alone, the cost of cholesterol screening and cholesterol-lowering drugs now stands at $60 billion per year, even though a positive risk/benefit ratio for such treatment has never been established.
Grundy was equally schizophrenic about the benefits of dietary modification. "Whether diet has a long-term effect on cholesterol remains to be proved," he stated, but "Public health advocates furthermore can play an important role by urging the food industry to provide palatable choices of foods that are low in cholesterol, saturated fatty acids and total calories." Such foods, almost by definition, contain partially hydrogenated vegetable oils that imitate the advantages of animal fats.
Grundy knew that the trans fats were a problem, that they raised serum cholesterol and contributed to the etiology of many diseases. He knew, because a year earlier, at his request, Mary Enig had sent him a package of data detailing numerous studies that gave reason for concern, which he acknowledged in a signed letter as an important contribution to the ongoing debate.
Other mouthpieces of the medical establishment fell in line after the Consensus Conference. In 1987, the National Academy of Sciences published an overview in the form of a handout booklet, containing a whitewash of the trans problem and a pejorative description of palm oil - a natural fat high in beneficial saturates and mono-unsaturates that, like butter, has nourished healthy population groups for thousands of years, and, also like butter, competes with hydrogenated fats because it can be used as a shortening.
The following year, the Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health emphasized the importance of making low-fat foods more widely available. Project LEAN (Low-fat Eating for America Now) - sponsored by the J. Kaiser Family Foundation and a host of establishment groups such as the American Heart Association, the American Dietetic Association, the American Medical Association, the USDA, the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute - announced a publicity campaign to "aggressively promote foods low in saturated fat and cholesterol in order to reduce the risk of heart disease and cancer".
Dr. Rifkind said, at the time of the Consensus Conference, "It is thought to be the first study in man to establish conclusively that lowering cholesterol reduces heart attacks and heart attack deaths."
Dr. William E. Conner, another master planner, from the Oregon health Sciences University, told the Conference that the best method to lower cholesterol in the blood was a stringent diet, with lower cholesterol. This is false, but it was presented with a straight face and fancy slides.
 |
Another
master planner was Scott M. Grundy,
author of the American Heart Association
diet which warned against butter and
eggs. This may well have been the first
point where the hidden puppeteers emerged
into some public view. From the
viewpoint of the hidden master planners,
the American heart Association would be
the best agency to take over since it
could then give its blessing to all the
research and promotion of the drug cure
of the cholesterol disease! I've caught the American Heart Association lying through its teeth about their false claim that their recommended diet, and their recommended drugs, have reduced the death rate from heart disease. Click Here to read that story. |
Click Here to read an early version of the National Consensus -- and see the official list of all the participants.
You find it hard to believe that these lies were hatched in so blatant a fashion.
As powerful as Dr. Steinberg was, controlling the outcome of this conference, the real masters were sill behind the scenes -- the puppeteers pulling the strings.
There were prominent scientists who objected to the steam-roller being pushed along by Dr. Steinberg.
|
|
Another
objector was Dr. Thomas Chalmers, of Mt.
Sinai Medical School and the Harvard
School of Public Health: "They have made an unconscionable exaggeration of all the data." Click on the button for the footnote. |
|
|
Another objector was David Kritchevsky who announced that his research did NOT show that dietary cholesterol caused blood cholesterol. He has since become a distinguished member of the faculty of The Wistar Institute. Click on the button for the footnote. |
|
|
Another
objector, simply ignored by Steinberg,
was Robert E. Olson, a physician and
specialist or nutrition at the State
University of new York who said: "We have to keep an open mind on whether we understand this disease or not. My view is that we do not." Click on the button for the footnote. |
Two objectors (Ahrens and Corday) felt so strongly about the conclusions being rammed down their throats by Steinberg that they wanted to issue a minority report. They were simply manipulated out of the way. There WAS no minority report.
Remember, this was all happening about Christmas time, in an academic setting, in 1984. This made no news for your local paper!
The consensus of the Conference had already been prepared before the participants met. The concept of the findings appeared much earlier, in 1982, written by the American Heart Association.
By 1985, with all the powerful lies placed in the media and corrupt medical journals, the final plan for the attack on America was given a name:
National Cholesterol Education Program
You won't hear much about this attack today because, fortunately, it failed -- mostly.
It was launched in 1987.
In 1987 I had already, for more than two years, been heavily involved in giving lectures on heart disease. One of the first persons who ever heard me was Bob Hutton, in 1985. He tried the vitamin formula I recommended, and some months later wrote this letter to me.
Dear Karl,
You asked me to report on my feelings after taking your oral chelation vitamin formula.
May I go back in history?
Nine years ago I had colon cancer which required two operations in 8 days. I am completely cured -- only a little scar and 3 feet less of large colon.
Three years ago I had a double bypass and was told that I already was living on borrowed time.
Three weeks later the colon operation developed adhesions and I had another major operation.
Before that I had had 16 intravenous chelation treatments.
This leads me to always believe that I was kidnapped and the whole thing was created by a spasm of the heart! This fact was verified by my regular doctor -- the one who gave me the chelation. Before Christmas I had 4 chelations -- one each month.
From that time on I had no treatments until I began taking your formula.
I was dizzy at times; my fingers turned gray and numb upon exposure to cold; and I was getting short of breath.
After taking Life Glow for only two weeks my dizziness disappeared. My fingers no longer responded negatively to cold. And I have a lot of energy. I was walking at the rate of 15 minutes per mile for three or four miles almost every day.
Now, after two months of your vitamin formula I find even bigger improvements. I am a member of Golden K (Kiwanis for old retired men). Yesterday we planted flowers around a retirement home.
I am not the youngest member but I did more work than any six of the others. I pushed a rot tiller, then spaded more ground and planted flowers while on my knees without a single pain getting up.
If you have ever gardened you'll realize the work that I did. Today, I remembered that I had a knee that used to lock and pain when I arose from kneeling.
I feel truly great, ready for many more years to add to my 71. There seems to be only one flaw in your formula; physically I feel great but I see no improvement in my mind. of course, if you have nothing to build upon you can produce no results. (joke)
I know this is too long for your wants, so feel free to shorten and paraphrase. I would say that after taking your formula for only two weeks my dizziness disappeared and my circulation improved greatly. After 2 months I have much more energy and I found my carotid artery had opened up.
My long ago injured knee is responding in a wonderful manner. I have the energy of a fifty year old.
We leave for Canada the last of this month, where I will be chopping wood, moving boats, lifting logs and walking over hills -- and fishing.
As ever,
Robert L. Hutton
I have been involved in this fight, personally, for many years. In 1987, it happens, I had started a series of articles exposing these medical frauds -- many of these were published in a national newspaper. Here are the headlines for just a few of the articles I wrote.
Modern Junk Food Linked to Heart Disease Deaths
Cholesterol Getting a Bad Rap
From Medical, Media "Experts"
There's
Money Motive Behind
Misinformation on Cholesterol
Eat Butter, It's Good Food
Noted
Nutritionist Warns
Beware Homogenized Milk
Hidden
20-year-Old Study
Hints at Origin of Disease
Science
Misrepresents Nature of
Viruses in Cures Approach
There was another article I published when the National Cholesterol Education program was first made public.
I had at least something to do with the early failure of this so-called education program.
Here's what the program set out:
Wanting to start with a worthy goal, the master planners decided to manipulate the research findings so that it could be proven that at least 25% of all Americans suffered from an incurable disease which only a drug could handle. Remember, they were not after a cure, but only management of the problem.
One way to do this manipulation was simply to find out what were the cholesterol levels of millions of Americans and arbitrarily announce that the cholesterol level for the top 25% of Americans was dangerously high. Of course, the announcements came out with different words. The announcement said something like:
We have discovered, based on scientific research, that any cholesterol level of 240 is dangerously high!
The fact that the "240" figure just happened to match the top 25% of Americans was NOT incidental!
Now that the problem had been announced to be as large as it was, there would then have to be more announcements about how large the problem was!
The
coordinator, James I Cleeman, of the National
Cholesterol Education program announced:
It's a mammoth intervention and it deserves to be a mammoth intervention.
The Program launched two separate and massive campaigns. one was aimed at the doctors who were going to reap the benefit of the new scare campaign about cholesterol. The other campaign was aimed at the general public to get them worried about their cholesterol levels.
The Federal Government financed these campaigns. Many millions of dollars were spent sending out very thick (and very false) reports about the dangers of cholesterol. Dr. Cleeman is STILL the head of this program in 2002 -- a long tenure for a false idea.
The public was easy to sell. You just ask a dozen of your friends whether they think it is healthy to eat three eggs every day, or to eat butter instead of margarine. You'll find that most of your friends believe the myth about the dangers of cholesterol.
The doctors were not that easy to convince. By their nature, doctors are more prone to look at the evidence than are the public. opinion polls of doctors in 1983 showed that less than 40% of the doctors had bought the story, while two thirds of the public believed the lies.
Doctors agreed that smoking was dangerous, but that was about the end of their agreement on heart disease risks.
So, the Program targeted doctors for a massive publicity campaign. One of the messages to the public was:
Ask your doctor about cholesterol.
The public assumed that all doctors agreed with the cholesterol myth. In fact, the dissent among doctors had been very vigorous, and continued to give the master planners their challenge for wining the war in favor of drugging America.
While the American heart Association was one of the original master planners, it would normally get a non-paid new president every now and then, and the master planners actually made a mistake when they allowed Dr. Thomas N. James to become president.
They made a similar error in 1998!
You understand that the drug campaign included lots of noise about how important a change of diet was -- that was the first message. Drugs were hidden in the rear to come forth when the patient realized that he didn't have the will power to change his diet, or when he discovered that his diet change didn't make any difference in his cholesterol count. But, even the possibility of diet changing the blood cholesterol level was suspect and Dr. James felt so strongly about this that in 1980 he said:
I wish to present some personal reservations about our nonexceptional advice, which is taken by the public as meaning everyone should be concerned about their dietary cholesterol.
While the
heart, Lung and Blood Institute was the
original source, apparently, of the
"consensus" that dietary cholesterol caused
heart disease, it was also true that this
Institute had many advisory panels of
influential physicians. The director of the
Institute, Claude Lenfant, was aware that his
own advisory council was so opposed to the
cholesterol story that he never asked them to
approve the National Cholesterol Education
Program because he didn't need their approval
for public education. He did need it for
studies of medical research, but not for
education.
But, Dr. Lenfant did need some money, one day, for research on how to influence America's doctors about the need for diet to control cholesterol. He finally had to confront this group and they turned him down.
One of the members of that panel was Dr. Eliot Corday who led the dissent, and said:
Physicians just aren't convinced (about cholesterol).
Six months later, another turn-down!
He finally got the composition of that group changed, and got his project through it so that he could spend even more money propagandizing doctors with Federal funds.
In a rare mood of bragging about his "victory," Dr. Lenfant said:
I must admit that each time we have a discussion about cholesterol it's interesting.
The drug companies, of course, were eager to help the government propagandize doctors about the benefits of drug-control over blood cholesterol. The drug companies drooled at the mouth for a drug program which recommended a life-time drug management of the largest cause of death in America. The drugs which make the most money for the drug companies are of this type -- management, not cure.
|
|
Since the master planners originated from within the drug companies they now had the fruits of their work. They had the government not only doing their research for them, but also doing their advertising for them. It was YOUR tax dollars which the drug companies were using to sell you the lies that led to your worry about eggs and butter. |
Even though the AMA had been originally opposed to the cholesterol myth, by 1988 they were fully infiltrated at the top and they, along with two large food companies (Kellogg and American home products), launched a massive campaign on television, magazines, cereal boxes, cholesterol books (like many of those mentioned in the bibliography) and all sorts of other media.
Even as this propaganda was being released, there were many honest scientists who disagreed. They regularly got their scientific studies published, but hose publications never got any popular press.
The master planners were so arrogant that they didn't care anymore about controlling the medical journals -- they had convinced the media and the public -- so the advertisements on television started telling you how margarine could save you from a heart attack.
I will simply conclude this section by asserting that we, the American public, have been the target of a massive master plan to drug us into apathy. Apathetic citizens don't object to corruption in government.
There are many master planners in this plot --as there are many victims.
A few months ago a lady I know was riding a bus in Los Angeles, saw bill board that offered a cholesterol check-up for only $60. She had been so influenced by the years of lies about cholesterol, and was feeling badly that particular day, so she made a point of going to the clinic. She was tested, scared to death at the report of "high cholesterol" and took her Mevacor prescription with trembling hands to the pharmacy. There she leaned that the drug would cost her $160 per month. She couldn't afford that expenditure and was now worrying herself into a fit of high blood pressure.
I gave her my data, but I am only one author in contrast with the millions that have been spent by the media manipulators -- the drug companies and the vegetable oil producers.
You are at risk when there is no government agency there to protect you from the lies being spread. You are even more at risk when the government is turned into a tool to suppress you even further.
Corruption Within The
Heart, Lung And Blood Institute
The final chapter in this story is about the corruption within the National heart, Lung and Blood Institute which allowed cholestyramine to be sanctioned as the officially recommended drug by the government. This stuff was so unpleasant in taste that when it was tested the researchers allowed for the possibility that up to 35% of the people taking it would refuse to continue. A large percentage of people who were supposed to be part of the official scientific trial of this stuff refused to take it. The cholesterol-lowering effect was also much less than they needed to substantiate its use.
Cholestyramine continues to be still available for sale -- under the brand name Questran, marketed by Bristol Laboratories.
Merck Sharp & Dohme's drug lovastatin (Mevacor) later became the drug officially sanctioned by the United States Government, and the one, had the master planners had their way, which you would have been forced to take, even against your will.
|
|
Commission on Life
Sciences
Date Organized: 01/01/82 Date Completed: (None) Work Statement:
|
Dr. Edward H. Ahrens,
Jr.; NAS (Member; 07/01/1982 --
06/30/1984) [Retired] The Rockefeller
University |
|
|
Thomas C. Chalmers MD Award Lewis Thomas said of Tom Chalmers, the epidemiologist, that he was a 'scientific gentleman' who had "contributed more than anyone else to the general field of science". Tom attributed the effectiveness of his lifelong asking of challenging questions about the effectiveness of medical practice to a mentor at medical school and to his early medical experiences. These led him to challenge the notion "that you can learn how patients should be treated by observing how doctors are treating them". He dedicated a long clinical and research career to studying the effectiveness of health care interventions by randomized trial and meta-analysis. He died in December 1995. |
|
|
DAVID KRITCHEVSKY, Institute professor, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, and Emeritus professor of biochemistry in surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia "THE SCIENTIST is as basic a resource to me as the Wall Street Journal is to the banker. The rest of the journals keep me informed about my specialty areas. THE SCIENTIST tells me about my world." David Kritchevsky has conducted pioneering research on the role of fat and calories in the development of cancer. Having switched from organic chemistry to biochemistry, he wrote the first major book on the metabolism of cholesterol and has demonstrated the different roles of saturated and unsaturated fats in atherosclerosis. He is currently undertaking a comprehensive look at how dietary interactions among nutrients might relate to degenerative disease. Kritchevsky has served as president of the American Institute of Nutrition and the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine. His many contributions have most recently been recognized with the Auenbrugger Medal, awarded last October by the University of Graz, Austria. |
Click here to read this article by David Kritchevsky. |
|
|
Ph.D., 1981, University of Minnesota,
School of Medicine, Department of
Anatomy. Degree in general anatomy with
emphases in gross anatomy, histology,
neuroanatomy, embryology and cell
biology.
M.S., 1972, University of North Dakota, School of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology. Degree in general physiology with emphases in medical physiology, neuroscience, and biochemistry. B.S., 1969, College of Great Falls, Great Falls, Montana with a biology major, chemistry minor. |
Click Here to read more about Bob Olson |
|
I promise to answer your message -- click here to send me a personal message
|
SUBSCRIBE: The Wednesday Letter is a free electronic monthly newsletter written and published by Karl Loren. You can view more than 50 back issues of this publication by clicking here. The Wednesday Letter subscription list is maintained on a secure server, no name is ever given or sold to anyone, and it is never used except for this Newsletter. It is automatically published on the Tuesday night just before the first Wednesday of every month. You can subscribe to this free monthly electronic letter by entering your eMail address and name below. You will then automatically receive a request for confirmation, sent to whatever address you have entered. If you do NOT receive this confirmation request, then you will not be subscribed. There may have been an error with your address and you should resubmit. The letter is never sent twice to the same address -- so you do not have to worry about a duplicate subscription. When you receive this confirmation request you must reply to it, or your subscription will not become active. No one can subscribe your name, and address, without you being notified, and if you get an unwanted notice of subscription you only need to DO NOTHING and the subscription will NOT be active.
REMOVAL: You can remove yourself from the subscription list in several different ways. Click here to read about this entire newsletter system. Every edition of The Wednesday Letter is delivered to your address with YOUR name and address in view on the letter, with a link that allows you to remove THAT name from the subscription list. If you try to send this removal message from an address different from the one you used to send in your original confirmation, then you will get a warning notice first, sent to the subscription address, asking you to confirm that you want to be removed from the list -- by replying to THAT request for confirmation, you will then be automatically removed. Thus, no one else can unsubscribe you, from some other computer, without your knowledge. But, if you send in the unsubscribe notice from the same machine used to receive the Letter, then the removal from the subscription list is automatic.
Personal Message: When you send a personal message to Karl Loren, you will receive a personal reply as per his instructions. Karl pledges that every personal message will get a personal answer. When you provide your mail address, we will send you free information including our free catalog and a cassette tape lecture by Karl Loren about heart disease, no charge, by mail, even if outside the US. You can select particular information you would like to receive, along with the free cassette tape and catalog.
You can reach Vibrant Life in many ways, including by mail to Vibrant Life, 2808 N. Naomi St., Burbank, CA 91504. Within the US and Canada, use the toll free number: (800) 523-4521, the local number: (818) 558-1799, the FAX: (818) 558-7299, eMail to kimberly@oralchelation.com or any one of the hundreds of message forms throughout the 50 web sites. Vibrant Life normally ships the same day we get an order. There are message forms on each of the 100,000+ pages on this and other sites where you can communicate with Vibrant Life. Check out our companion site, at: http://www.oralchelation.net where Karl's 2000 page book is published. Karl Loren is the author and webmaster for this BOOK, as well as for another web site about ORAL CHELATION. His personal philosophical articles are at PHILOSOPHY.
Copyright © April 25, 2008 2:38 AM by Karl Loren on behalf of Vibrant Life, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Permission is granted for non-commercial downloading, copying, distribution or redistribution on two conditions: One, that some form of copyright notice is included in every copy distributed or copied, showing the copyright belonging to Vibrant Life, Burbank, CA, at www.oralchelation.com . The second condition is that the material is not to be used for any purpose contrary to the purposes and objectives of this site. This permission does not extend to materials on this site which are copyrighted by others.